![]() ![]() On this particular domain autocad is far ahead. Well you can do 2D technical blackWhite drawings with some color in revit but that's far from what it should/could be. Same logic for printing (paperspace or objectspace) that lead to some heavy headache when Revit allows you to create a 2D detail component based on a line. For example, in the following drafting view, the studs, insulation, and siding are detail components. They scale with the model, rather than the sheet. Autocad is messy by the fact that you can define line weight by different method. Detail components are pre-drawn line-based 2D elements that you can add to detail or drafting views. Line weight aren't freestyled again can't force that param and must do for each style three style. (well to be honest just used them once on autocad, and that jammed the plotter but that was a few years ago)Ĭan't get material/texture from a material on a draft (could be usefull for legend in some case) Patterns definitions are insane (well same one on autocad) Line style have to be defined (no freestyle again) In some case that's time consuming 'xdelim' fonction is a killer one when it comes to arrayed elements inside block that need to be cropped Linestyle with text or forms on it!!!! (ok same insanity as pattern but autocad do it)ĭynamics blocks on autocad are quite good. For region tool you can't have a colorfill behind pattern in one step.Ĭan't change region on the fly (color or pattern) have to create or modify style havin' a free style region would be cool. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |